Tauler Smith Shakes Down Portland Shops Selling Boner Pills

Have you received a letter from Tauler Smith or from Levine Law Center demanding that you pay $10,000, or $2,500 for selling “male enhancement” pills or supplements that allegedly contain deceptive advertising and that YOU are somehow liable to Outlaw Laboratories?

Outlaw Laboratory, LP, a Texas Company, has sent what is understood to be 100s of letters to retailers in Portland, Oregon, and in other states, demanding that the retailer pay upwards of $10,000 to settle claims of unfair competition under the Lanham Act, a federal law prohibiting trademark infringement, deceptive advertising, and unfair competition.

The law firm, Tauler Smith, out of Los Angeles, makes the claim that the retailers are liable for stocking boner pills that it says the FDA has determined may contain the active ingredient in Viagra, and, therefore, are not truly “natural.” This somehow harms its client, Outlaw Pharmaceuticals. And, rather than trying to track down the Chinese manufacturer, Tauler Smith is attempting to shake down the retailers for $1000s, who are also victims of what are alleged to be the manufacturer’s misleading labels.

Now, Tauler Smith has hired a local attorney in Portland, Andrew Levine, who obtained his bar license in October, 2018, to pressure Portland area businesses to pay thousands or to be sued.

Two federal courts in Texas have thrown Outlaw Laboratory’s lawsuits brought against retailers who refused to pay after receiving demand letters. Judge Jane J. Boyle stated: “It looks likes a shakedown to me, it really does.”

One court noted that there are no federal cases where retailers have been held liable for the alleged false advertising on the packaging that they stock in their stores, and that allowing such a lawsuit to proceed would mean that every retailer is the guarantor for the manufacturer and/or distributor of every product on its shelf.

The Texas District Court found that Outlaw failed to allege that the retailers made false statements in the context of commercial advertising or promotion by merely putting the products on their shelves.

One lawyer arguing the case in Texas noted that anyone selling Coke Zero would be subject to a lawsuit if a maker of sugar free soft drinks found a trace of sugar in a can of Coke Zero.

Call our law office at 503.227.1928 to discuss your rights in the face of what appears, to at least one federal judge, to be a shakedown.

Legal Sex Change Gender Change in Oregon Courts

Since 2013, Oregon law does not require that a person submit to surgery prior to a court ordering a change in the person’s sex marker. Oregon law currently recognizes only two identifying words for a person’s “sex” – Male and Female. The Oregon process to change the legal gender/sex status from M to F or from F to M is relatively simple.  You do not need to hire a lawyer.

The Oregon law states:

A court * * * may order a legal change of sex and enter a judgment indicating the change of sex of a person if the court determines that the individual has undergone surgical, hormonal or other treatment appropriate for that individual for the purpose of gender transition and that sexual reassignment has been completed. (ORS 33.460).

In Multnomah County, Portland, the forms may be picked up, filled out, and filed on the second floor of the courthouse. The forms and instructions are at this link: Sex Change Forms and Instructions

You can file for Sex Change and for Name Change at the same time for one fee.

The filing fee is $111.

Judges in Portland will not ask for a doctor’s letter, as the law does not require a letter.

The Lane County Court website wrongly states that surgery is required.  Judges in jurisdictions outside of Portland may be less familiar with the law.

Call Lake at 503.227.1928 if you need assistance, or would prefer not to go to court, my office can handle all aspects of name and sex change orders and appear before the court on your behalf.

Law Works, Lake Perriguey and Lea Ann Easton file Lawsuit for Equal Access to Marriage in Oregon

Discrimination violates our federal constitution and harms individuals, families, businesses, and the economy.

It is time to liberate the oppressors.

These are the legal pleadings in the case:

Gay Discrimination Lawsuit Against The Heathman Restaurant

Former server, Chris Busby, has filed a lawsuit against The Heathman Restaurant alleging violations of Oregon law prohibiting discrimination in employment decisions that are based on a person’s sexual orientation.

Mr. Busby alleges that his supervisor called him a FAGGOT in front of other employees and in front of restaurant customers.  He alleges that he was fired after he complained about the discriminatory treatment.

Comcast to release subscriber information after subpoena in Oregon Bit Torrent movie downloading lawsuit alleging copyright infringement

Voltage LLC v. John Does 1 – 371

Case No.: 3:13-cv-00295-AA

Comcast sent a letter to hundreds of subscribers this month notifying them that, unless a judge issues an Order quashing or modifying a subpoena it had received from Voltage Pictures, LLC, the cable company and Internet Service Provider will release identifying subscriber information to Carl Crowell, a Salem, Oregon attorney who has filed copyright infringement suit alleging that hundreds of people have used bit torrent programs to illegally download the film, Maximum Conviction.

The lawsuit, Voltage Pictures LLC v. John Does 1 – 357, identifies 100s of IP addresses.  IP addresses are the unique numerical identifier associated with every internet portal that is identifiable whenever someone uses bit torrent to download content.

A subscriber with an IP address is only someone who may have evidence of a download.  A notice from Comcast does not mean that the subscriber is now a defendant or will ever become a defendant.

Subscribers may want to file a MOTION TO QUASH the subpoena, to try to stop Comcast from revealing the subscriber name associated with an IP address.  There may be a constitutional and privacy interest in the right to “speak” on the internet anonymously.

This case is not a criminal case.  It is a civil case brought by a movie owner aimed to discourage the unpaid downloading of films and to extract judgments and payments from those that downloaded the film.

Remember, copyright infringement is also a crime, also.  Therefore, the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination may be invoked in this civil case.  Subscribers cannot be compelled to answer questions that could implicate them in criminal conduct.

Consult with a lawyer should you receive a notice from your cable company or your internet service provider.

OregonTorrentMaximumConviction — click here to see lawsuit with IP subscriber numbers

Lake Perriguey, Esq.

Law Works LLC
1906 SW Madison Street, Portland, OR  97205   http://www.law-works.com

lake@law-works.com